The Autumn Republic concludes the Powder Mage trilogy with, if you’ll pardon what in this case is a fairly terrible pun, a bang. This trilogy is the first finished major series* in the new flintlock fantasy genre. If you just want a quick verdict on the trilogy- it’s pretty good. Not perfect, but definitely good, and shows definite signs that Brian McClellan is going to have a very interesting writing career ahead of him. The Autumn Republic has clear prose, fast paced and well constructed action scenes, sympathetic characters, and interesting worldbuilding.
Really quick, let’s get the complaints out of the way, of which I only really have a couple. Some of the foreshadowing in the books could have been handled better. There were several instances of it in the previous books that led me to believe certain subplots would materialize here in the finale that simply never occurred. While there was resolution to them, it did not take the path the books seemed to indicate they would. That can partially be chalked up to the author deciding to take a different path with the book- which he did a fine job of. There aren’t any internal inconsistencies presented by the change of course, just a little minor cognitive dissonance- really cognitive indigestion- it caused me. A lot of it was likely caused by some of the theories about what was going to happen that I built up in my own head. Overall, not a big deal.
Minor spoilers ahead:
The other big complaint I had is in regards to the villains, especially the chief villain- they could have had a little more oomph. Frankly, none of them really felt as dangerous as Lord Vetas, a major antagonist from the first two books. Lord Claremonte, the big villain of The Autumn Republic, who was actually Lord Vetas’ master, despite being incredibly wealthy, intelligent, and possessed of an extremely deadly secret, just isn’t as intimidating as Vetas. That’s not to say he’s a bad villain, just that Vetas is a better one. (There’s also another fairly good villain from the first two books whose name eludes me right now that I preferred to Claremonte. Duke something or other, of Kez.)
Though I can go on for quite a while when complaining about something, there was a lot more to like than dislike. The titular gunpowder mages are very enjoyable to follow. Many magic systems rely on sheer, absurd power levels to make action scenes interesting. Don’t get me wrong, I like flying archmages hurling lightning, fire, and monstrous curses at each other as much as the next guy, and there is a good bit of that in these books with the Privileged, but the powder mage’s much more subdued powers make for damn good reading. They get increased strength, speed, and senses from eating or snorting gunpowder, they can guide bullets or shoot them farther, they can detonate gunpowder at range, and they can subdue or control gunpowder explosions to a small extent. They’re still powerful and dangerous, but there is much more of a sense of personal danger involved when they’re in battle- they might be tougher than normal, but they can still be killed by bullet or blade, there is a definite danger of addiction to gunpowder, and yet they can actually take on the much more powerful Privileged, at least if they have the element of surprise or planning on their behalf. There’s a much greater level of tension involved while following the powder mages than other magic users in fantasy.
The worldbuilding is decent, especially when it comes to the main country, Adro, and more specifically the capitol Adopest- it really feels like a fleshed out, real place to live. Outside of Adro, the other countries do feel a bit unfleshed, but since the overwhelming majority of the action occurs in Adro and Adopest, that’s pretty forgivable.
The POV characters are one of the book’s strongest points- they’re all compelling, flawed, and have strong voices of their own. I’ve got to reinforce the flawed bits- unlike so many characters in so many books by new authors, whose flaws only exist to keep them from being Mary Sue characters, the POV characters here are often actually hurt or set back by their flaws, and have to really struggle against them, which make for some of the best scenes in the book. Even the minor characters feel well fleshed out, and almost none of them feel like cut and pasted tropes- even characters who appear for just a few pages in a single scene have distinct personalities, traits, and quirks of their own.
Overall, it’s definitely a fun read, and is further proof of the increasing breadth of the fantasy genre, which for much too long was dominated by a very small array of plots, settings, and characters, very often drawn almost directly from Tolkien. The Powder Mage trilogy delivers exactly on what it promises.
*This isn’t, of course, to say that flintlocks, colonial age politics and battles, etc, haven’t shown up in fantasy before- L. E. Modesitt Jr. has produced several examples of this in his various fantasy series. I’d put the divider as a stylistic/ worldbuilding difference. Gunpowder in previous fantasy series frequently isn’t a world changing invention, but something allowed by changing conditions in the fantasy world itself- for example, magic itself getting weaker, making it harder for magic users to detonate the gunpowder inside the guns. In addition, they frequently have very different politics that the more conventional image of colonial politics, or lack colonial politics entirely. (Which can only make that world much, much better to live in.) That all being said, it would be an entirely valid argument to make at this point that flintlock fantasy either is a preexisting subgenre, or that this is just a new arbitrary genre division, of which SF/F has a veritable overabundance. Honestly, I’ll probably end up taking one of those tacks in the end, most likely the idea that it’s a preexisting subgenre. (I don’t complain too much about the frequent subgenre divisions, since I like putting things in boxes. …It’s funny because they’re books, and… nevermind.)